Monday, December 29, 2008

A New Route to Roseophilin

In an effort to educate my readers, I’ve put together an analogy.  Admittedly, you probably won’t see this sort of problem on any SAT (maybe a MENSA-qualifying exam one day), but here it goes:

Stoltz : Wolff/Cope :: Frontier : ____________

  • (a) Wynn/Trump
  • (b) Jahn-Teller
  • (c) Nazarov
  • (d) Knoevenagel/Diels-Alder
  • (e) Corey

I enjoy reading work from Alison Frontier’s group; they handle a good array of challenging projects that contribute to the overall (practical) growth of synthetic organic chemistry.  Admittedly, I’ve even gone so far as to ask a prof in our department to invite her for a guest seminar.  The Frontier group invests a large amount of research effort towards Nazarov chemistry—that would be answer (c)—those pesky 4-pi, conrotary, electrocyclization reactions that are often covered in physical organic chemistry to highlight the importance of orbital overlap. 

Nazarov chemistry can be used to construct cyclopentanones from divinyl or allyl-vinyl ketones.  I became interested in Nazarov chemistry when I saw Frontier’s total synthesis of merilactone A (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 300-308).  Despite the modest yield, Frontier eloquently demonstrated an Ir(III)-catalyzed Nazarov cyclization (historically, Nazarov reactions require an excess of Lewis acid).  I continue to check in on her publications from time to time.

Frontier and Bitar have recently carried the Nazarov chemistry into the formal synthesis of roseophilin (Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 49-52), an antitumor antibiotic of medium-size, and fairly complex functionality.  Fuchs and co-workers are credited with the first formal synthesis of racemic roseophilin (Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2601-2604), and over the past 10 years (or so), several other groups have thrown their respective hats into the ring (Trost, Boger, Fürstner, Dudley, etc.).  While several of these synthetic routes focus on Paal-Knor conditions, Frontier’s approach made use of Nazarov chemistry to access the [3.3.0] bicycle. 

Frontier’s Nazarov conditions required catalytic use Sc(III) salts and 1 molar equivalent of lithium perchlorate.  Presence of the LiClO4 is believed to convert the Sc(OTf)3 to Sc(ClO4)3—a highly active catalyst in Nazarov cyclizations (Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 3319).  In methodological studies prior to this synthesis, Frontier noted a similar effect (Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5661).  While I like the method Frontier developed, I wonder if there was a way around the dichloroethane. 

Tsuji-Trost allylation of the enone gave the tricyclic roseophilin frame in 82%.  I have a few comments to make about this step.  First, the large amount of palladium(II) acetate and air-sensitive ligand makes this specific allylation chemistry slightly undesirable.  Second, the product contained ~20% of a diene side product, which taken into accound, adjusts the yield to ~66%.  Also, sodium hyride is not terribly practical given the pKa of the active methylene moiety; a better bet may have been to use K2CO3.

All in all, a good chapter in the roseophilin saga. 

Happy New Year from the RoOC staff—me.  

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm sure you could run that Nazarov in toluene at that temperature, but it might run a bit less efficiently.

J said...

Thanks for the comment!

You might be right; I had considered benzene. In either case I wonder if solubility would be an issue.

Anonymous said...

The use of DCE seems benign when one considers that they are using stoich perchlorate salts which are highly explosive.

Also, I'm not sure what your quibble with NaH is based on. It is a bit of overkill pKa-wise, but it ensures complete and irreversible conversion to the malonate anion, which is certainly a boon when making a macrocycle. Also, these are just the traditional conditions for Tsuji-Trost allylation of malonates, they probably didn't feel like reinventing the wheel.

J said...

Thank you for your comment.

I think that the perchlorate is a necessary evil for making the Nazarov chemistry happen whereas you can be a bit more flexible with solvent choice. In my mind (i.e. disqualifying perchlorate for its explosive properties) it's analogous to not using osmium tetroxide for dihydroxylation just because it may cause cornea damage.

With respect to the acetoacetate moiety (active methylene), K-carb will essentially make the deprotonation irreversible (similar to using NaH). Though, you make an incredibly valid point about not wanting to reinvent the wheel. Still, I'd be curious to see how K2CO3 would work.

J said...

It seems that the only real pitfall in this chemistry is use of scandium triflate because of its sheer cost. Yields can always come up by methodology development, but catalyst choice is an important component.

Didn't Dudley run Meyer-Schuster reactions with gold(III) then scandium(III) then found out that copper(II) triflate worked just as well. By analogy, I wonder if copper would work in this case.